kosakgroove Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Guys dont you think thay we should be a little bit less exposed? Just search hackintosh in google and bam insanelymac is one of the first hits, along with wikipedia, which also explains about hackintosh a little bit and link to insanelymac.too.. Do we really need that kind of exposure ( to Apple which has a knowledge of where they can screw our Hackintosh ability a few clicks away and will definitely target our weaknesses) to the world? What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Bro, and what we can hide from Apple? Just in some countries make Hackintoshes is against the law, e.g: USA. Read this: Is it legal to install OS X on a PC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosakgroove Posted March 23, 2016 Author Share Posted March 23, 2016 I know but they can read about all the techniques a few clicks away... Isnt that just a little bit too much of pushing it? Arent we being a little bit too lucky ?? In my oppinion thats what they have been doing since Mavericks.. Restricting and locking down the system further. I believe it is gonna keep getting harder for Hackintosh specislly since Apple knows all about us and our hacks and workarounds can easily be known and patched.. I would put my faith on anything for Apple not to lock the system down in a iOS fashion, like they have been doing, but hey, I guess we will have to stick with what we have till now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 If we have the law in our side, nothing is too serious. Furthermore, we make Hackintosh since 2005 hehe Do you read the article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosakgroove Posted March 23, 2016 Author Share Posted March 23, 2016 My oppinion is not about legality.. It is about them knowing our methods and screw many things up for us.. SIP is an example of something more serious probably ahead of us. For example insanelymac could be a closed website where you can only view content if you create account.. That could filter a bit of uninteresting people... Oh and to successfully create account and read anything on the website you should first have to pass the OSx86 quiz 1 and 2 and perhaps add a third? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 My oppinion is not about legality.. It is about them knowing our methods and screw many things up for us.. SIP is an example of something more serious probably ahead of us. If they (Apple) create an method for block us (100%), it's over...nothing to do.. For example insanelymac could be a closed website where you can only view content if you create account.. Urgh, no. We don't have any secrets, and how we'll know who is an Apple spy? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe75 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/3879/1/3879.pdf Please don't steal Mac OS! Really, thats way uncool. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockDown Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Guys dont you think thay we should be a little bit less exposed? Just search hackintosh in google and bam insanelymac is one of the first hits, along with wikipedia, which also explains about hackintosh a little bit and link to insanelymac.too.. Do we really need that kind of exposure ( to Apple which has a knowledge of where they can screw our Hackintosh ability a few clicks away and will definitely target our weaknesses) to the world? What do you think? How and where do you think you can get help if the scene is not exposed, Apple?. What do you think? For example insanelymac could be a closed website where you can only view content if you create account.. That could filter a bit of uninteresting people... Oh and to successfully create account and read anything on the website you should first have to pass the OSx86 quiz 1 and 2 and perhaps add a third? Anyone can just make an account and pass the quiz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosakgroove Posted March 24, 2016 Author Share Posted March 24, 2016 I think theres a fine line between being 100% exposed, having a semi-secure forum with account need in order to read, and an invite only community. I suggest the 2nd option, it would filter a lot of people I think. Its just an oppinion, the mods will do whatever they want, but that will remain my oppinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midi-sama Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I think (just my opinion) that we are helping Apple than making it lose! All those KPs and security bypassing and some devices emulations to make it think it's an Apple device are reported to Apple, whether you like it or not. Knowing that Apple made a move about MBL/SN/ROM thing for iMessage, that means they acknowledge our existence and what we're doing. And we are not the only one, everytime I type Hackintosh or OS X on PC on google (on a new pc, mine always shows IM at first) the first link is TonyMacx86 then comes IM and other websites related to osx86 project. All these information helps Apple to better its OS, make moves against us, so that we find holes and some hacks. if Apple didn't want us to do that, it could have made all its sources closed (for example the kernel, that way AMD users could boot OS X on their rigs). They are profiting from our backs and we're actually ok with that, since it's not our sw but theirs! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnifico Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 but we are not hackers ... why should we hide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midi-sama Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 but we are not hackers ... why should we hide This is a hacking website, making an os that is not supposed to be on a device be on that device. That's hacking. We are not cracking tho. And that still doesnt mean to hide and we are not actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockDown Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Apple is loving it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaneee Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 The way I see it is Apple don't mind too much. They did include FakeSMC and other OSx86 kexts in the AppleKextExcludeList remember 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) In fact, they added our kexts in the exceptions list. Look what i've find in "OSKextSigExceptionList": They are our friends And the list is too long to post here, but in "OSKextExcludeList", you can find only this: OSKextExcludeList at.obdev.nke.LittleSnitch LE 4041 com.AmbrosiaSW.AudioSupport LE 4.0.0 com.BT.kext.bpkkext LE 1.0.0 com.baltaks.driver.DoubleCommand LE 1.6.9 com.getgreenbytes.driver.zfs LE 2012.09.14 com.getgreenbytes.filesystem.zfs LE 2012.09.23 com.kaspersky.kext.klif LE 2.2.1d19, 3.0.0d18, 3.0.0d23, 3.0.1d29 com.kaspersky.nke LE 1.0.1d41, 1.6.0d9, 1.6.1d11 com.pgp.kext.PGPnke LE 1.1 com.vmware.kext.vmci LE 3.1.4 com.vmware.kext.vmioplug LE 0053.60.16 com.vmware.kext.vmnet LE 0053.60.16 com.vmware.kext.vmx86 LE 0053.60.16 com.vmware.kext.vsockets 90.1.3 com.webroot.driver.SecureAnywhere LE 104 org.pqrs.driver.NoEjectDelay LE 5.3.0 This kext is in Mavericks, i don't know if they have added more kexts in Yosemite or El Capitan. Edited March 27, 2016 by Allan grammar 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosakgroove Posted March 24, 2016 Author Share Posted March 24, 2016 Wow i had no idea they were helping us like that. Let's just hope for a better future and better relationships between Apple and Hackintoshes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky1979 Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 In fact, they added our kexts in the exceptions list. Look what i've find in "OSKextSigExceptionList": Screen Shot 2016-03-24 at 1.03.52 PM.png Screen Shot 2016-03-24 at 1.04.11 PM.png They are our friends And the list is too long to post here, but in "OSKextExcludeList", you can find only this: <key>OSKextExcludeList</key> <dict> <key>at.obdev.nke.LittleSnitch</key> <string>LE 4041</string> <key>com.AmbrosiaSW.AudioSupport</key> <string>LE 4.0.0</string> <key>com.BT.kext.bpkkext</key> <string>LE 1.0.0</string> <key>com.baltaks.driver.DoubleCommand</key> <string>LE 1.6.9</string> <key>com.getgreenbytes.driver.zfs</key> <string>LE 2012.09.14</string> <key>com.getgreenbytes.filesystem.zfs</key> <string>LE 2012.09.23</string> <key>com.kaspersky.kext.klif</key> <string>LE 2.2.1d19, 3.0.0d18, 3.0.0d23, 3.0.1d29</string> <key>com.kaspersky.nke</key> <string>LE 1.0.1d41, 1.6.0d9, 1.6.1d11</string> <key>com.pgp.kext.PGPnke</key> <string>LE 1.1</string> <key>com.vmware.kext.vmci</key> <string>LE 3.1.4</string> <key>com.vmware.kext.vmioplug</key> <string>LE 0053.60.16</string> <key>com.vmware.kext.vmnet</key> <string>LE 0053.60.16</string> <key>com.vmware.kext.vmx86</key> <string>LE 0053.60.16</string> <key>com.vmware.kext.vsockets</key> <string>90.1.3</string> <key>com.webroot.driver.SecureAnywhere</key> <string>LE 104</string> <key>org.pqrs.driver.NoEjectDelay</key> <string>LE 5.3.0</string> This kext is in Mavericks, i don't if they have added more kexts in Yosemite or El Capitan. My WifiInjector.kext is there ... I'm an "official" hacker 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosakgroove Posted March 25, 2016 Author Share Posted March 25, 2016 I am happy that Apple recognised the work of all the great devs in our community love to all the crazy hackintoshers that make this possible 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnifico Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 My WifiInjector.kext is there ... I'm an "official" hacker ...can you make also kext for NVME ssd ?? Mr Apple ?? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky1979 Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 I'm Mr Banana other fruit .. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosakgroove Posted March 26, 2016 Author Share Posted March 26, 2016 And where are all the MR Cheap'o ? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnifico Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 And where are all the MR Cheap'o ? cheap-new-macbook.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts