Vitaliy Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 (edited) --- Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bikedude880 Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 The first question, and I'm sure it will be the most asked: Is that actually a Hackintosh or is that a real Apple computer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted October 17, 2006 Author Share Posted October 17, 2006 (edited) - Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enb14 Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 what about a video on youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted October 17, 2006 Author Share Posted October 17, 2006 (edited) - Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuXb Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 You're pretty darn quick, aren't you .. You just had a couple of hours time to modify the 10.4.8 kernel source to boot into write protected -s mode. Wow I'm really stunned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mifki Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 It is possible if you know what to patch as im sure the initialisation routines havent (or shouldnt have) really changed that much in the new sources Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fokker Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 In what type of machine does this kernel run? Core (2) duo or something? what are the requierements. It is usable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwhsh8r Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 ... howd u do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted October 17, 2006 Author Share Posted October 17, 2006 (edited) - Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mifki Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 Im sure at the moment it will be Intel, SSE3 (or 2) and a mob which has HPET ( if he hasnt bypassed it), but it could just be on a mac so we dunno yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted October 17, 2006 Author Share Posted October 17, 2006 (edited) - Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skredii Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 Where did you get those sources from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted October 17, 2006 Author Share Posted October 17, 2006 (edited) - Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takuro Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 This is strange... does your processor have a dual-core, Vitality? It should be easier (technically) to run a 10.4.8 kernel on a Core Duo because of certain power management instructions that are specific to a Core Duo's architecture. That's why all kernels since the 10.4.4 release haven't been able to run on the majority of our CPUs. If the 10.4.8 kernel was really patched, this is big news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted October 18, 2006 Author Share Posted October 18, 2006 (edited) - Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mifki Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 yah many people think HPET is CPU dependent, but it is actually a feautre of the motherboard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proteo Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Yeah, Pentium D's are dual core. They are not Core Duo though. Their setup is quite similar to mine! :D Kudos Vitaliy, that’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blkblt Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Very, very nice work! Hopefully the new Rosetta will (or can be made to) work with this new kernel, then we'll be in really good shape... /blkblt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guiyoforward Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 how does this relate to semthex's efforts? http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?sho...c=30316&hl= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mifki Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 how does this relate to semthex's efforts?http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?sho...c=30316&hl= Not as far as i know (which is pretty far) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asap18 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 wait not too sure, but did u just install darwin or did you incorporate the kernel into mac os x? Because if it is the latter, you are one amazing person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollcage Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Yeah, Pentium D's are dual core. They are not Core Duo though. Their setup is quite similar to mine! :D Kudos Vitaliy, that’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind he actually said "that's one small step for A man, one giant leap for mankind." transmission wasn't the best quality (imagine that, they were on the moon) and people misheard his statement. just a "did you know?"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asapreta Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 OFF: There was a site that tells this trip to the moon was fake! Translated from Portuguese to English by Google: http://translate.google.com/translate?u=ww...Flanguage_tools Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted October 18, 2006 Author Share Posted October 18, 2006 (edited) - Edited November 20, 2006 by Vitaliy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts