I'm trying to decide which Linux to put on my Mactel. I'm curious as to which Linux is the best and why. Vote for your favorite and please post why (If you voted "Other," post what it is!). Thanks for your help!
234 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 26 September 2005 - 11:41 PM
#2
Posted 27 September 2005 - 12:14 AM
SLACK SLACK SLACK
#3
Posted 27 September 2005 - 01:29 AM
To be honest, all Linux distros have advantages and disadvantages. The important is to run Linux
For further info, take a look at this site:
http://distrowatch.c...?resource=major
#4
Posted 27 September 2005 - 03:10 AM
Gentoo works best because you compile it yourself. It is the most optimized for your computer, and it's very customizable. If you're not good with unix, though, it's not for you.
#5
Posted 27 September 2005 - 05:19 AM
Fedora Core, because it has a very large and helpful group of users. There are several excellent user-to-user support sites to get quick help with problems, and for learning your way around, much like this site is a huge help in getting OSX on x86 working for all of us.
#6
Posted 27 September 2005 - 06:30 AM
I use Arch Linux, it is blazingly fast
and easy to use (if you have knowledge of Linux before)
#7
Posted 27 September 2005 - 08:43 AM
Since your new to linux I would say the ezer to try and use would be ubuntu Because of apt-get and synaptic,alsp there forums and wiki are great.And Mandrive its user friendly and a lot of ppl coming over to linux start there.
#8
Posted 27 September 2005 - 05:30 PM
Damn Small Linux (DSL) at 50mb distro size. Nice to install on a thumb drive and run your own APache\MySQL\PHP. So that leaves you with enough room for serving files.
. The next one, eventhough it's "not supported" is RH9.
#9
Posted 27 September 2005 - 07:10 PM
My vote goes to Gentoo.
By the way, why is FreeBSD on the list?
By the way, why is FreeBSD on the list?
#10
Posted 27 September 2005 - 07:16 PM
It should be *nix variants, actually.. But most modern Unices (BSD, Linux et al..) use X and its myriad window managers. I recommend getting a distro with either Portage or Apt-Get. They're great package management systems. Gentoo users in general seem to be a bit loyal to their distro, though.
You'll still get the same UI and commands, though; the main differences are in bundled apps and drivers, ease of installation, packaging, and support.
You'll still get the same UI and commands, though; the main differences are in bundled apps and drivers, ease of installation, packaging, and support.
#11
Posted 27 September 2005 - 11:24 PM
Fugu, on Sep 27 2005, 03:10 PM, said:
My vote goes to Gentoo.
By the way, why is FreeBSD on the list?
By the way, why is FreeBSD on the list?
blahsucks, on Sep 27 2005, 03:16 PM, said:
It should be *nix variants, actually.. But most modern Unices (BSD, Linux et al..) use X and its myriad window managers. I recommend getting a distro with either Portage or Apt-Get. They're great package management systems. Gentoo users in general seem to be a bit loyal to their distro, though.
You'll still get the same UI and commands, though; the main differences are in bundled apps and drivers, ease of installation, packaging, and support.
You'll still get the same UI and commands, though; the main differences are in bundled apps and drivers, ease of installation, packaging, and support.
#12
Posted 28 September 2005 - 01:00 AM
Seems that Ubuntu is getting quite a number of votes but no one has commented on it. Personally, I've used Ubuntu since it's first release and I must say that it's a pretty snappy distro. The installer fits in a single CD, and they'll even ship it to you for free. The community support is highly active as well. Moreover, a new version is scheduled for release in October so it might be a good time to get it as well.
#13
Posted 28 September 2005 - 02:49 AM
Eggman, on Sep 27 2005, 11:24 PM, said:
Are you serious? There's no real difference in the GUI? So, basically, any distribution will be about the same? 
They all use the same GUI's, but some may ad/or logos and customize the menus. The two most common GUIs are KDE and Gnome. There are other elements that differentiate the distros such as installation, installing programs, ect..
#14
Posted 28 September 2005 - 05:38 AM
weeguy, on Sep 28 2005, 09:00 AM, said:
Seems that Ubuntu is getting quite a number of votes but no one has commented on it. Personally, I've used Ubuntu since it's first release and I must say that it's a pretty snappy distro. The installer fits in a single CD, and they'll even ship it to you for free. The community support is highly active as well. Moreover, a new version is scheduled for release in October so it might be a good time to get it as well. 
#15
Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:33 AM
Use any Linux that supports VMWare Workstation 5.0
Too bad VMWare doesn't run in Ubuntu, but Red Hat, SUSE, Fedora Core and Mandrake does.
I'm really impressed with the speed Windows XP runs in VMWare. It flies with only 192MB memory and completely usable on my P4 1.6Ghz. Sometimes I forget I'm inside Linux when the guest Windows XP is running full screen.
:-)
Too bad VMWare doesn't run in Ubuntu, but Red Hat, SUSE, Fedora Core and Mandrake does.
I'm really impressed with the speed Windows XP runs in VMWare. It flies with only 192MB memory and completely usable on my P4 1.6Ghz. Sometimes I forget I'm inside Linux when the guest Windows XP is running full screen.
:-)
#16
Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:34 AM
optimus, on Sep 28 2005, 11:33 AM, said:
Use any Linux that supports VMWare Workstation 5.0
Too bad VMWare doesn't run in Ubuntu, but Red Hat, SUSE, Fedora Core and Mandrake does.
I'm really impressed with the speed Windows XP runs in VMWare. It flies with only 192MB memory and completely usable on my P4 1.6Ghz. Sometimes I forget I'm inside Linux when the guest Windows XP is running full screen.
:-)
Too bad VMWare doesn't run in Ubuntu, but Red Hat, SUSE, Fedora Core and Mandrake does.
I'm really impressed with the speed Windows XP runs in VMWare. It flies with only 192MB memory and completely usable on my P4 1.6Ghz. Sometimes I forget I'm inside Linux when the guest Windows XP is running full screen.
:-)
vmware does run in ubuntu,go to there forums and read up on it
#17
Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:45 AM
JaS, on Sep 28 2005, 11:34 AM, said:
vmware does run in ubuntu,go to there forums and read up on it 
In the specs, there's no mention of Ubuntu
http://www.vmware.co....html#wp1000805
I'm gonna check the forums, they've probably recompiled the kernel with vmware-config.pl. Thanks for the tip!
#18
Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:50 AM
optimus, on Sep 28 2005, 11:45 AM, said:
In the specs, there's no mention of Ubuntu
http://www.vmware.co....html#wp1000805
I'm gonna check the forums, they've probably recompiled the kernel with vmware-config.pl. Thanks for the tip!
http://www.vmware.co....html#wp1000805
I'm gonna check the forums, they've probably recompiled the kernel with vmware-config.pl. Thanks for the tip!
Yea they dont support that distro.some ppl have had some problems getting vmware to run in ubuntu...but that goes for all linux distros.
#19
Posted 02 October 2005 - 05:54 PM
I think I'm going to use Ubuntu for now. Thanks for all your help! However, now I need to know something else:
What is the difference between GNOME and KDE?
Thanks for helping! And feel free to keep voting!
What is the difference between GNOME and KDE?
Thanks for helping! And feel free to keep voting!
#20
Posted 05 October 2005 - 09:53 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked








