RehabMan Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 and last.... what Azul framebuffer values should be tried ? all from 0 to 15 or only value 10 ? tnx again I think the best, most likely, and one that was working for you before, was IntelAzulFB=10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truztruz Posted May 11, 2014 Author Share Posted May 11, 2014 Tried binpatch and both 0a16 and 0a26 device id with IntelAzulFB=10, but still no AppleIntelHD5000Graphics.kext loaded . Attached ioregs with both device id injection. ioreg110514.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RehabMan Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Tried binpatch and both 0a16 and 0a26 device id with IntelAzulFB=10, but still no AppleIntelHD5000Graphics.kext loaded . Attached ioregs with both device id injection. Verify md5 sum of AppleIntelHD5000Graphics. md5 /System/Library/Extensions/AppleIntelHD5000Graphics.kext/Contents/MacOS/AppleIntelHD5000Graphics Make sure you repair permissions & rebuild cache. Also, try booting "-f" then posting ioreg. -- Edit... Also try this patch (in addition to previous patch): # binary patch for desktop HD4400 (trades mobile HD4400 for desktop HD4400) sudo -s cd /System/Library/Extensions/AppleIntelHD5000Graphics.kext/Contents/MacOS perl -pi -e 's|\x85\x80\x16\x0a|\x85\x80\x1e\x04|g' AppleIntelHD5000Graphics cd /System/Library/Extensions touch . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truztruz Posted May 11, 2014 Author Share Posted May 11, 2014 Second patch gets osx stuck on boot...... in verbose mode it ends in a black terminal screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RehabMan Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Second patch gets osx stuck on boot...... in verbose mode it ends in a black terminal screen. The driver is probably loading in that case, but not working. There is probably a reason they put that check in... I think it is easier to purchase a CPU that has supported graphics in the first place. Or add a compatible graphics card. Given I don't have this hardware, I'm out of ideas/energy to pursue the matter further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truztruz Posted May 11, 2014 Author Share Posted May 11, 2014 Hi RehabMan, Thank you very much for all your time and help. Even if my HD4400 desktop is still not working properly I have learn many things thanks to your help. I think I'll buy an nvidia Gt630 video card. Do you know if this will work oob without problems? Thank you again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RehabMan Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Hi RehabMan, Thank you very much for all your time and help. Even if my HD4400 desktop is still not working properly I have learn many things thanks to your help. I think I'll buy an nvidia Gt630 video card. Do you know if this will work oob without problems? Thank you again I have no experience with nvidia. I have no need for anything more than integrated graphics for what I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RehabMan Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Hi RehabMan, Thank you very much for all your time and help. Even if my HD4400 desktop is still not working properly I have learn many things thanks to your help. I think I'll buy an nvidia Gt630 video card. Do you know if this will work oob without problems? Thank you again You could try a slightly different patch (must patch vanilla): perl -pi -e 's|\x85\x80\x12\x04|\x85\x80\x1e\x04|g' AppleIntelHD5000Graphics cd /System/Library/Extensions perl -pi -e 's|\x86\x80\x12\x04|\x86\x80\x1e\x04|g' AppleIntelHD5000Graphics cd /System/Library/Extensions Probably will work equally as bad as the last set, but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truztruz Posted May 12, 2014 Author Share Posted May 12, 2014 You could try a slightly different patch (must patch vanilla): perl -pi -e 's|\x85\x80\x12\x04|\x85\x80\x1e\x04|g' AppleIntelHD5000Graphics cd /System/Library/Extensions perl -pi -e 's|\x86\x80\x12\x04|\x86\x80\x1e\x04|g' AppleIntelHD5000Graphics cd /System/Library/Extensions Probably will work equally as bad as the last set, but... Patch applied. Even if it doesn't get system stuck on boot, still no AppleIntelHD5000Graphics.kext loaded. Ioreg attached ioreg120514.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RehabMan Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Patch applied. Even if it doesn't get system stuck on boot, still no AppleIntelHD5000Graphics.kext loaded. Ioreg attached Out of ideas for now. Except... "swap the CPU" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanc Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Have you try using chimera 3.01? ####### For HD 4400/4600/5200 mobile processors in desktop configuration, use IGPlatformID=0D220003 ####### Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RehabMan Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Have you try using chimera 3.01? ##### For HD 4400/4600/5200 mobile processors in desktop configuration, use IGPlatformID=0D220003 [/size] ####### It just makes it easier to get the framebuffer to load (CI). Still no QE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanc Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Intel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop is a variant of Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop and both uses the same Intel GT2 Graphics core Compared to Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop, its performance is only slightly lower. Since both are the same core, is it possible to make the system recognize the hd 4400 as hd 4600? In theory it should work isnt it? since hd4600 is supported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RehabMan Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Intel HD Graphics 4400 Desktop is a variant of Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop and both uses the same Intel GT2 Graphics core Compared to Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop, its performance is only slightly lower. Since both are the same core, is it possible to make the system recognize the hd 4400 as hd 4600? In theory it should work isnt it? since hd4600 is supported. The kext is checking against actual device ids in the code. A patch was tried (read this thread), but it didn't work, at least for the people who have tried it. I don't have the hardware, so no ability to confirm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeroShark Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 I can also confirm the patches not working for me (CPU: i3-4130, Mobo: ASUS H87i-Plus, Boot: Clover UEFI). I think it'd be fun to get OS X working on this particular box, but it's not critical for me. So if there is still interest from others in getting this to work I'd be interested to try various patches/suggestions. Although I'm not totally incompetent with having built 2 hackintosh in the past, I'm not advanced enough, or at least not familiar, with writing such patches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gluxon Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 I managed to get AppleIntelFramebufferAzul.kext to load from the Clover steps regarding this. (Fake ID: 0x04128086 and ig-platform-id: 0x0d220003) However, my single monitor now comes up as a dual screen configuration, with OS X showing me the second. Does anyone know where I would have to look to get OS X to see only a single screen? Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanc Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 I managed to get AppleIntelFramebufferAzul.kext to load from the Clover steps regarding this. (Fake ID: 0x04128086 and ig-platform-id: 0x0d220003) However, my single monitor now comes up as a dual screen configuration, with OS X showing me the second. Does anyone know where I would have to look to get OS X to see only a single screen? Thanks in advance. Can you show the steps on how you managed to get the kext loaded and running? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gluxon Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 Can you show the steps on how you managed to get the kext loaded and running? Thanks By using Fake ID 0x04128086 and ig-platform-id 0x04128086 in Clover. This doesn't load QE, so there shouldn't be a huge difference. However, this was really important for me since I can use f.lux now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metroidnemesis13 Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 If anyone needs to test on a mobile chip, I have 4400HD graphics. Judging from these posts though, sounds like the kernel patch didn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts