gils83 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 yes and no, the company where I work has 7MW power of 1 MW heating and cooling power with 22 boxes for cooling an area of 28 000 m2, we get 30,000 people per year (spa) powers are not comparable! Intel or AMD, irrelevant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eep357 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 hello , I think you're right, the measured values are wrong in my opinion, the processor remains icy after a battery of tests which is not normal in my opinion, the motherboard In addition to a max TDP of 95 W and a frequency of 4.9 ghtz, I must greatly exceed the 125 w. I think it should be a synthetic test and physical processor is 3.3 ghz, I'll do a test to see if 5.5 ghz Clover is not a chimera of all these results. I confirm distorts the Clover, the figures true or false?? FX 6100 is 4.02 and the test cinebench 7500 Geekbench test As you may have started to suspect after going up to impossible speeds like 5.5ghz, the results are false. Clover has option to set processor speed or turbo mode in it's settings for those rare occasions that the true speed is not being auto detected properly. If you set the speed in clover much higher than the bios and leave system running a while, you'll probably also see the clock in the menubar is a few minutes ahead of what time it should be. Every benchmark uses time in one way or another since PCs are basically big clocks, frequency components run at, clock cycles, everything except storage capacity/file size, revolves around time. Most look at how long it's different tasks take to complete, and generates a score based on this; the faster it gets done, the higher the score, or the more things it can get done in a given amount of time, the higher the score. Even for GPU benches that score FPS, the more frames in a second, the higher the score. So by increasing the clock speed that OSX thinks everything is running at it also thinks everything is happening faster than it really is. So while GPU may only be doing 30 FPS, it thinks it did 60 FPS, or while it really took 2 min to run all the geekbench tests, it thinks they were done in only 1 min. When you do this, truth is your performance actually gets worse since many operations are designed to do things in a given amount of time. Set bios to stock speed and bump clover way up and you'll see desktop animations moving noticebly slower or the chase seen in Cinebench look slow motion, OSX is actually slowing them down because it thinks they are all moving faster than they really are. I too found this out the hard way, changed speed back to default in bios while doing some other hardware testing and seeing all my benchmark scores skyrocket. I was very happy! But had a hunch it was too good to be true I wasn't going to post this fearing some people may purposely do this just to cheat benchmarks, but once I saw your comment I could tell you were already suspicious so it would have ended up here sooner or later. No such thing as a free overclock 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 As you may have started to suspect after going up to impossible speeds like 5.5ghz, the results are false. Clover has option to set processor speed or turbo mode in it's settings for those rare occasions that the true speed is not being auto detected properly. If you set the speed in clover much higher than the bios and leave system running a while, you'll probably also see the clock in the menubar is a few minutes ahead of what time it should be. Every benchmark uses time in one way or another since PCs are basically big clocks, frequency components run at, clock cycles, everything except storage capacity/file size, revolves around time. Most look at how long it's different tasks take to complete, and generates a score based on this; the faster it gets done, the higher the score, or the more things it can get done in a given amount of time, the higher the score. Even for GPU benches that score FPS, the more frames in a second, the higher the score. So by increasing the clock speed that OSX thinks everything is running at it also thinks everything is happening faster than it really is. So while GPU may only be doing 30 FPS, it thinks it did 60 FPS, or while it really took 2 min to run all the geekbench tests, it thinks they were done in only 1 min. When you do this, truth is your performance actually gets worse since many operations are designed to do things in a given amount of time. Set bios to stock speed and bump clover way up and you'll see desktop animations moving noticebly slower or the chase seen in Cinebench look slow motion, OSX is actually slowing them down because it thinks they are all moving faster than they really are. I too found this out the hard way, changed speed back to default in bios while doing some other hardware testing and seeing all my benchmark scores skyrocket. I was very happy! But had a hunch it was too good to be true I wasn't going to post this fearing some people may purposely do this just to cheat benchmarks, but once I saw your comment I could tell you were already suspicious so it would have ended up here sooner or later. No such thing as a free overclock hello , exact, Clover plays only on the system clock, which is logical to be, it is not able to change the bios settings without validation parameter changes it. it's frustrating. That said the FX 6100 is capable of running at 5 ghz, I've tried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kikobeats Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 http://browser.primatelabs.com/user/54544 In Win I have +10000 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted March 6, 2013 Author Share Posted March 6, 2013 Do you boot UEFI with Windows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted March 8, 2013 Author Share Posted March 8, 2013 (edited) Lion 10.7.5, Bronzovka kernel, 64-bit mode: http://browser.prima...kbench2/1730679 Lion 10.7.5, Bronzovka kernel, 64-bit mode: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1730833 Edited March 8, 2013 by theconnactic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kikobeats Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Do you boot UEFI with Windows? What? I don't understand. this is my Win7 score Can you think of any way to improve my score on mac? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted March 15, 2013 Author Share Posted March 15, 2013 No, Kiko: it already should match Win7. By the way, my score with 10.8.3 is the higher i've ever got with my AMD machine: http://browser.prima...kbench2/1755850 Best regards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burkett375 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted March 20, 2013 Author Share Posted March 20, 2013 Phenom II x6 1090T? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burkett375 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Phenom II x6 1090T? 960T unlocked to x6 and overclocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 simulator Clover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitcore Posted March 23, 2013 Share Posted March 23, 2013 Got this right now http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1791898 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 23, 2013 Share Posted March 23, 2013 hello Bitcore this is normal, the clock of your OS X is not good and influt on any system where the extreme speed of opening and closing page, pass your CPU to 3.1 in your config.plist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitcore Posted March 23, 2013 Share Posted March 23, 2013 Yeah i saw your post:) Ill try it Tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 x86_64 ML DP1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oswaldini Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 MSI X79A-GD65 8D + i7-3970X @ 4.4 GHz (6 cores) + 4x4 GB 1600MHz CL9 + GTX660 + CloverEFI Geekbench x64: 21132 http://browser.prima...kbench2/1813630 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 MSI X79A-GD65 8D + i7-3970X @ 4.4 GHz (6 cores) + 4x4 GB 1600MHz CL9 + GTX660 + CloverEFI Geekbench x64: 21132 http://browser.prima...kbench2/1813630 hello !!! CPU 1000 euros vs CPU 100 euros !!!! ahahahahah !! http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1687946 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptp Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 10.7.5 32 bit rc12 kernel http://browser.prima...kbench2/1860992 Windows 7 32 bit http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1861039 thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted April 13, 2013 Author Share Posted April 13, 2013 A difference of 60 points in a 6000+ level is negligible ( All the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anerik70 Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 This is mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptp Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 A difference of 60 points in a 6000+ level is negligible (< 1%). But do make sure spotlight indexing is not occurring: it lowers consistently the scores. Other thing: OSX perform the best with 64-bit scores, beating Windows in a regular basis. Try a 64-bit benchmark, since the kernel does allow it. All the best! 64 bits http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1861872 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted April 14, 2013 Author Share Posted April 14, 2013 See? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcobco Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 (edited) compu:~ cc$ uname -a Darwin compu.local 11.4.2 Darwin Kernel Version 11.4.2: пятница, 12 апреля 2013 г. 22:05:27 (MSK); BronzovkaAnVoodoo_Sinetek###:xnu-1699.32.7/BUILD/obj//RELEASE_I386 i386 compu:~ cc$ time geekbench Geekbench 2.2.6 : http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/ Geekbench is in tryout mode Geekbench is limited to running 32-bit benchmarks while in tryout mode. Please purchase Geekbench to remove all limitations found in tryout mode. If you would like to purchase Geekbench you can do so online: http://store.primatelabs.ca/ If you have already purchased Geekbench, enter your email address and license key from your email receipt with the following command line: geekbench -r <email address> <license key> System Information Operating System Mac OS X 10.7.5 (Build 11G63) Model Hackintosh Motherboard Apple Inc. Mac-F4208DC8 1.0 Processor AMD Athlon X2 7850 @ 3.00 GHz 1 Processor, 2 Cores, 2 Threads Processor ID AuthenticAMD Family 16 Model 2 Stepping 3 L1 Instruction Cache 64.0 KB x 2 L1 Data Cache 64.0 KB x 2 L2 Cache 512 KB x 2 L3 Cache 2.00 MB Memory 4.00 GB 4198 MHz DDR2 SDRAM BIOS Apple Inc. MP31.88Z.006C.B02.0801021250 Integer Blowfish single-threaded scalar 2105 |||||||| multi-threaded scalar 3975 ||||||||||||||| Text Compress single-threaded scalar 1976 ||||||| multi-threaded scalar 3626 |||||||||||||| Text Decompress single-threaded scalar 2040 |||||||| multi-threaded scalar 3723 |||||||||||||| Image Compress single-threaded scalar 1859 ||||||| multi-threaded scalar 3187 |||||||||||| Image Decompress single-threaded scalar 1428 ||||| multi-threaded scalar 2689 |||||||||| Lua single-threaded scalar 2881 ||||||||||| multi-threaded scalar 5088 |||||||||||||||||||| Floating Point Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar 1903 ||||||| multi-threaded scalar 3483 ||||||||||||| Dot Product single-threaded scalar 3100 |||||||||||| multi-threaded scalar 5597 |||||||||||||||||||||| single-threaded vector 2639 |||||||||| multi-threaded vector 5397 ||||||||||||||||||||| LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar 733 || multi-threaded scalar 1213 |||| Primality Test single-threaded scalar 2935 ||||||||||| multi-threaded scalar 4432 ||||||||||||||||| Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar 5324 ||||||||||||||||||||| multi-threaded scalar 9467 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Blur Image single-threaded scalar 6982 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||| multi-threaded scalar 12519 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Memory Read Sequential single-threaded scalar 3358 ||||||||||||| Write Sequential single-threaded scalar 3307 ||||||||||||| Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar 2367 ||||||||| Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar 1549 |||||| Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar 2242 |||||||| Stream Stream Copy single-threaded scalar 2884 ||||||||||| single-threaded vector 3766 ||||||||||||||| Stream Scale single-threaded scalar 3392 ||||||||||||| single-threaded vector 3597 |||||||||||||| Stream Add single-threaded scalar 1426 ||||| single-threaded vector 3584 |||||||||||||| Stream Triad single-threaded scalar 1564 |||||| single-threaded vector 2797 ||||||||||| Benchmark Summary Integer Score 2881 ||||||||||| Floating Point Score 4694 |||||||||||||||||| Memory Score 2564 |||||||||| Stream Score 2876 ||||||||||| Geekbench Score 3451 ||||||||||||| Upload results to the Geekbench Result Browser? [Y/n]n real 1m46.124s user 1m52.034s sys 0m10.197s ________ EDIT: memory is wrong detected ________ PS: i would like to ask people to post in this thread the output of "uname -a" followed by "time geekbench", instead of screenshot or link to. just to improve the thread reading. thanks in advance Edited April 15, 2013 by bcobco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Phenom x4 960t unlocker enable x6 ok Frequency CPU 3.0 (200x15) stock Frequency CPU CPB turbo (200x19) 3.8 Vcore 1,475 stock Ram 1333 stock (200x8) 1600 PCIE x100 stock C1E disable cool n' Quiet disable HPET enable AHCI enable chameleon 2252 + SMBIOS iMac 12.1 + KernelPatcher.dylib / flag : npci=0x2000 GraphicsEnabler=No (arch=i386 for 10.7.5) kernel 11.4.2 Fix Bronya for 10.7.5 kernel 12.3 Fix Bronya for ML 10.8.4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fxb_VFQsovw https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=feDhNvkP4Mw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts