theconnactic Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 Because there's no better way to measure our degree of success than seeing what the numbers say. Well, maybe not: real life user experience cannot be reduced to numbers only, but surely they matter. Post here your results. Let's show our fellow Intel hackintoshers how good an AMD machine can be! This one is not mine, but from Gilles: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaneee Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 Here are mine =D Snow Leopard > http://browser.prima...kbench2/1369761 Lion > http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1529234 Mountain Lion > http://browser.prima...kbench2/1500134 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
instant idiot Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 I don't own Geekbench, so 32-bit only. Mountain Lion: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1499613 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMadOne Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 64bit geekbench score! AMD PhenomII 1090T x6 Mountain Lion - http://browser.prima...kbench2/1503997 Proof: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted January 8, 2013 Author Share Posted January 8, 2013 My athlon with Mountain Lion 10.8.2, current amd_kernel from AnV, running in safe mode: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happel Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Snow Leopard: 5543 Mountain Lion: 5499 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacedaemon Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Snow Leopard: Coming Soon! Lion (32 bit): http://browser.prima...kbench2/1546419 Mountain Lion: 32 bit - http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1546446 64 bit - http://browser.prima...kbench2/1546438 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Gigabyte GA-78LMT SP2/ FX 6100 @ 4,5 / RAM générique 4096 1333 / ventirad stock / o/c by Clover kernel Sinetek 11.4.2 FX bootloader : Clover 1050 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted February 23, 2013 Author Share Posted February 23, 2013 Amazing, Gilles: you're almost catching up with my i5 3570K. Here's my Athlon II X2 250 with Bronzovka's 10.7.4 Hybrid 32/64-bit kernel: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1681588 au dessus , tu veux dire ! ahahah !! above, you mean! ahahah! Now I would like to see an i5 3570 @ 4.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oswaldini Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Now I would like to see an i5 3570 @ 4.5 No problem Score: 13535 http://browser.prima...kbench2/1624227 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 good !!! I'll try the 11000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted February 23, 2013 Author Share Posted February 23, 2013 Gilles, my i5 rig consistently scores more than 11.000 in Geekbench at stock clock, as you can see for yourself here: http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?app=core&module=attach§ion=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=120036 Anyway, it's wonderful to see the first gen. Bulldozer achieving these impressive results. I think you can break the 11.000 barrier indeed. When you run GB, make sure Spotlight indexing is not running. Oswaldini, unfortunately i cannot overclock, since my mobo is a H77-DS3H (paradoxically, my BIOS offer the option, that's crazy). I think you could achieve even higher scores with 10.8.2 (10.8.3 beta clearly lowered mine) and UEFI Clover boot. Best regards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oswaldini Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 I'm using CLOVER in UEFI mode Mine i5-3570K is unstable while running higher than 4.5GHz. I get 13535 with 4.5GHz by each core. gils83, you should work with your hackintosh harder ! You shoudn't use smbios for MacPro3.1. I bet you don't get proper power management. I get over 11k score in GB at stock with proper PM. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 yeaahhh !!!! http://browser.prima...kbench2/1683755 Gilles, my i5 rig consistently scores more than 11.000 in Geekbench at stock clock, as you can see for yourself here: http://www.insanelym...ttach_id=120036 Anyway, it's wonderful to see the first gen. Bulldozer achieving these impressive results. I think you can break the 11.000 barrier indeed. When you run GB, make sure Spotlight indexing is not running. Oswaldini, unfortunately i cannot overclock, since my mobo is a H77-DS3H (paradoxically, my BIOS offer the option, that's crazy). I think you could achieve even higher scores with 10.8.2 (10.8.3 beta clearly lowered mine) and UEFI Clover boot. Best regards! me too my motherboard o/c it, I did with Clover http://www.gigabyte.fr/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3833#ov 35 euros !! ahahah !! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted February 23, 2013 Author Share Posted February 23, 2013 Did what, Gilles? Congratulations for your result! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 thank you what I mean is that with Clover and matèriel low end, it works miracles. complete configuration AMD is less expensive that the only i5 3570. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) I'm using CLOVER in UEFI mode Mine i5-3570K is unstable while running higher than 4.5GHz. I get 13535 with 4.5GHz by each core. gils83, you should work with your hackintosh harder ! You shoudn't use smbios for MacPro3.1. I bet you don't get proper power management. I get over 11k score in GB at stock with proper PM. hello , I think you're right, the measured values are wrong in my opinion, the processor remains icy after a battery of tests which is not normal in my opinion, the motherboard In addition to a max TDP of 95 W and a frequency of 4.9 ghtz, I must greatly exceed the 125 w. I think it should be a synthetic test and physical processor is 3.3 ghz, I'll do a test to see if 5.5 ghz Clover is not a chimera of all these results. I confirm distorts the Clover, the figures true or false?? FX 6100 is 4.02 and the test cinebench 7500 Geekbench test Edited February 23, 2013 by gils83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chokoboster Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 Do you have two overclocked hacks, chokoboster? By the way, we use the same wallpaper. In fact, i use it in all my hacks and even recently i started to use it with Windows too. Great desktop background. Gilles, i trust Cinebench way more than i trust Geekbench. But Geekbench became quite the standard for end user performance benchmarks, so that's the reason i choose it over any other tool for our topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chokoboster Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Do you have two overclocked hacks, chokoboster? By the way, we use the same wallpaper. In fact, i use it in all my hacks and even recently i started to use it with Windows too. Great desktop background. Gilles, i trust Cinebench way more than i trust Geekbench. But Geekbench became quite the standard for end user performance benchmarks, so that's the reason i choose it over any other tool for our topic. yes, I have two overclock hacks, Intel and AMD the AMD hacks is my old system, cheap system with good performance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 these tests are indicative, not more credible than i7 3770/16000 points 3.5 ghz phenom x4 960T unlocker that x6 to 15000 points. When we go to the reality of work figures are not all the same, I could make a difference by using the two platforms. the only thing that is true is that the price / performance ratio is largely in favor to AMD. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 Well, long life overclock! But we must consider the possibility Geekbench is taking advantage of the extra cores of your Phenom IIx6, thus the higher results. However, few real-life applications are already optimized for more than two cores, and the vast majority still run in a single core. So, while tests like Geekbench could show the performance potential of a given CPU, tests that are more task-specific (like rendering benchmarks etc) tend to give results closer to the real user experience. Anyway, i can tell i agree with you: AMD is unbeatable as long value is concerned, in the short to middle term and not considering scenarios like server arrays and big enterprise usage (where the higher power consumption of most AMD CPUs nullify this advantage). Best regards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 yes, this is true for power consumption, it remains on when the configuration is accompanied by a graphic card 500 w! 25w the differences are negligible. In the workplace, it is quite another, though, when we see wasted energy to cool the building, the rest seems quite ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 In the workplace, no savings are ever ridiculous But for the home user, i agree with you. In fact, you agreed with me, lol. Best regards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts