Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 oh i'm sorry. i keep forgetting. ok yea i went ahead and updated my bios to FF (again) but i did it correctly this time. i didn't realize the updating the bios RESETS the bios configurations. so i edit all those to their respective settings. so now i'm currently typing this on an upgraded bios.still no boot from hdd tho. i finally found chameleon (all i had to do was boot from hdd duuhh lol) i see the goofy ass looking chameleon and i hit "enter". it loads the gray apple screen and boom! (drum rolls) KERNAL PANIC actually to be honest i didn't know there was a 64bit ubuntu.... let me check while i'm typing this... ... ... ok yea, i downloaded the file called "ubuntu-11.04-desktop-amd64" so thats 64 bit correct? cause the 32 bit versions is called "ubuntu-11.04-desktop-i386" so i guess i did use the 64bit one. so where to from here? i got my latest bios up and running so thats good. but i see no improvements (or issues) just runs the same. so is there another way to dump that dsdt? seems like 64bit ubnutu doesn't support this commends, download the i386 (32bit) and do what i told you there.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 seems like 64bit ubnutu doesn't support this commends, download the i386 (32bit) and do what i told you there.. hmm ok then! i pmed you btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 ok. it created a dsdt.dsl file on the desktop. but i got that error like i told you in the pm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 ok. it created a dsdt.dsl file on the desktop. but i got that error like i told you in the pm. it's ok i searched and it's ok. now you done the other commend? (iasl) if so, then your pure DSDT is ready to use. store it somewhere, and on osx use auto-patcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 it's ok i searched and it's ok.now you done the other commend? (iasl) ok sorry i had to come back to the mac side (i was getting the famouse "ips driver" errors on this site with ubuntu). so i ran this other command i found online to extract this and i got a bunch of files on my desktop, including a dsdt.aml file with my motherboards name on the folder and everything. but the .aml file is ZERO bytes.. is tat normal? is it an empty file? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 ok sorry i had to come back to the mac side (i was getting the famouse "ips driver" errors on this site with ubuntu). so i ran this other command i found online to extract this and i got a bunch of files on my desktop, including a dsdt.aml file with my motherboards name on the folder and everything. but the .aml file is ZERO bytes.. is tat normal? is it an empty file? it not normal the ips was here also on the mac.. it's known problem with the forum not with ubnutu... so, what commend did you run? and did you done what i told you? the error seem to be nothing, and you should be able to generate your dsdt how i told you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 it not normalthe ips was here also on the mac.. it's known problem with the forum not with ubnutu... so, what commend did you run? and did you done what i told you? the error seem to be nothing, and you should be able to generate your dsdt how i told you well i opened the autopatcher and selected the new dsdt file i created with ubuntu and its succesfully "applying" the patch... but is been "applying the patch" for about 5 minutes now :/ i don't reallly think its doinf aything since the file size hasnt changed. it still says zero byte. i used a downloaded script from another user online and it opened up in terminal in ubuntu and started doing its things. it created a folder with all the info of my motherboard, sound card, ram etc etc... EDIT: yea this isnt working its just sitting there but it ain't patching {censored} lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 of course it will do nothing cause there is nothing to do to a zero bytes file please try again my method of dumping dsdt, ignore errors and hopefully everything will be good and you will have dsdt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 of course it will do nothing cause there is nothing to do to a zero bytes file please try again my method of dumping dsdt, ignore errors and hopefully everything will be good and you will have dsdt ignore the errors? yea i guess i should of done that lol k i'ma give it another go... to the ubunto-mobile! ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ cd /home/ubuntu/Desktop ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo acpidump -t DSDT -b -odsdt.dsl Wrong checksum for generic table! ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl sudo: iasl: command not found ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl sudo: iasl: command not found those are my errors it did creat that dsl file on my desktop but its locked (has a pic of a little lock on it) and its kb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 ignore the errors? yea i guess i should of done that lol k i'ma give it another go... to the ubunto-mobile! ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ cd /home/ubuntu/Desktop ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo acpidump -t DSDT -b -odsdt.dsl Wrong checksum for generic table! ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl sudo: iasl: command not found ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl sudo: iasl: command not found those are my errors it did creat that dsl file on my desktop but its locked (has a pic of a little lock on it) and its kb ok for iasl you need in terminal sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install iasl then run again sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 okfor iasl you need in terminal sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install iasl then run again sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl i think that worked... i got this (ignored that error like you told me) and this came out: The following NEW packages will be installed: iasl 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 341 kB of archives. After this operation, 758 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main iasl i386 20100528-3 [341 kB] Fetched 341 kB in 1s (220 kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package iasl. (Reading database ... 136438 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking iasl (from .../iasl_20100528-3_i386.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up iasl (20100528-3) ... ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ cd /home/ubuntu/Desktop ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ cat /proc/acpi/dsdt > dsdt.aml cat: /proc/acpi/dsdt: No such file or directory ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo cat /proc/acpi/dsdt > dsdt.aml cat: /proc/acpi/dsdt: No such file or directory ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ iasl -d dsdt.aml Intel ACPI Component Architecture AML Disassembler version 20100528 [Oct 15 2010] Copyright © 2000 - 2010 Intel Corporation Supports ACPI Specification Revision 4.0a Loading Acpi table from file dsdt.aml Could not get table from the file ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo cat /proc/acpi/dsdt > dsdt.aml cat: /proc/acpi/dsdt: No such file or directory ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ iasl -d dsdt.aml Intel ACPI Component Architecture AML Disassembler version 20100528 [Oct 15 2010] Copyright © 2000 - 2010 Intel Corporation Supports ACPI Specification Revision 4.0a Loading Acpi table from file dsdt.aml Could not get table from the file ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ cd /home/ubuntu/Desktop ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ cat /proc/acpi/dsdt > dsdt.aml cat: /proc/acpi/dsdt: No such file or directory ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ iasl -d dsdt.aml Intel ACPI Component Architecture AML Disassembler version 20100528 [Oct 15 2010] Copyright © 2000 - 2010 Intel Corporation Supports ACPI Specification Revision 4.0a Loading Acpi table from file dsdt.aml Could not get table from the file ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo apt-get install iasl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done iasl is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo apt-get update Ign cdrom://Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release i386 (20110427.1) natty InRelease Ign cdrom://Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release i386 (20110427.1) natty/main TranslationIndex Ign cdrom://Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release i386 (20110427.1) natty/restricted TranslationIndex Ign cdrom://Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release i386 (20110427.1) natty/main Translation-en_US Ign cdrom://Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release i386 (20110427.1) natty/main Translation-en Ign cdrom://Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release i386 (20110427.1) natty/restricted Translation-en_US Ign cdrom://Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release i386 (20110427.1) natty/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates InRelease Ign http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security InRelease Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty Release.gpg [198 B] Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security Release.gpg [198 B] Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security Release [27.2 kB] Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty Release [39.8 kB] Get:6 http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/main Sources [64.8 kB] Get:7 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates Release [27.2 kB] Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/main Sources [862 kB] Get:9 http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/restricted Sources [14 B] Get:10 http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/main i386 Packages [169 kB] Get:11 http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/restricted i386 Packages [14 B] Ign http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/restricted TranslationIndex Get:12 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/restricted Sources [4,104 B] Get:13 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/main i386 Packages [1,550 kB] Ign http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/main Translation-en Ign http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com natty-security/restricted Translation-en Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/restricted i386 Packages [8,986 B] Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/restricted TranslationIndex Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/main Sources [101 kB] Get:16 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/restricted Sources [14 B] Get:17 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/main i386 Packages [303 kB] Get:18 http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/restricted i386 Packages [14 B] Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates/restricted Translation-en Fetched 3,157 kB in 7s (430 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo apt-get install iasl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done iasl is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 226 not upgraded. ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl Intel ACPI Component Architecture AML Disassembler version 20100528 [Oct 15 2010] Copyright © 2000 - 2010 Intel Corporation Supports ACPI Specification Revision 4.0a Could not open input file dsdt.dsl ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ cd /home/ubuntu/Desktop ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo acpidump -t DSDT -b -odsdt.dsl Wrong checksum for generic table! ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop$ sudo iasl -d dsdt.dsl Intel ACPI Component Architecture AML Disassembler version 20100528 [Oct 15 2010] Copyright © 2000 - 2010 Intel Corporation Supports ACPI Specification Revision 4.0a Loading Acpi table from file dsdt.dsl Acpi table [DSDT] successfully installed and loaded Pass 1 parse of [DSDT] Pass 2 parse of [DSDT] Parsing Deferred Opcodes (Methods/Buffers/Packages/Regions) .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Parsing completed Disassembly completed, written to "dsdt.dsl" now that 26kb dsl file is kb. but isn't it supposed to be an aml file? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 nope, it DSL file cause we use -d in iasl. it ok (if you want to know more, it converted the file from binary file to a dsl file, after this, auto-pathcer will create AML file with all the patched needed for your hardware) now, use that in auto-pathcer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 nope, it DSL file cause we use -d in iasl. it oknow, use that in auto-pathcer on the mac side right? EDIT: yeaaaaaaaaaa!!! ok i got the patched aml on my desktop.. now what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 on the mac side right? yup! no more ubnutu (you have successfully created your DSDT ) EDIT: yeaaaaaaaaaa!!! ok i got the patched aml on my desktop.. now what? ok now it's time to put it in /Extra folder it need to be loaded right away from chameleon try Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 yup! no more ubnutu (you have successfully created your DSDT ) ok now it's time to put it in /Extra folder it need to be loaded right away from chameleon try oh ok. i thought i had to leave it in the desktop and reinstall the aml with [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] or something. ok replacing old dsdt file with new one and restarting and loading from hdd... lets see.. be right back in a few minutes!!! EDIT: well that DIDN"T work as i am still getting a kernal panic when booting from hdd with chameleon ??????????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 i forgot something add this to your com.apple.boot.plist <key>GenerateCStates</key> <string>Yes</string> <key>GeneratePStates</key> <string>Yes</string> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 i forgot somethingadd this to your com.apple.boot.plist <key>GenerateCStates</key> <string>Yes</string> <key>GeneratePStates</key> <string>Yes</string> like this? (attached image) i added under the current list plist.tiff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 no you need arch=i386 or arch=x86_64 in kernel flag also i'm not sure PCIrootUID is a kernel flag, I'm checking YUP, PCIRootUID is not a kernel flag, instead use <key>Kernel Flags</key> <string>arch=i386</string> <key>PciRoot</key> <string>1</string> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 noyou need arch=i386 or arch=x86_64 in kernel flag also i'm not sure PCIrootUID is a kernel flag, I'm checking i also notice my "graphics enabler" says "no" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 i also notice my "graphics enabler" says "no" just wanted to say, why? replace with yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 noyou need arch=i386 or arch=x86_64 in kernel flag also i'm not sure PCIrootUID is a kernel flag, I'm checking YUP, PCIRootUID is not a kernel flag, instead use <key>Kernel Flags</key> <string>arch=i386</string> <key>PciRoot</key> <string>1</string> oh ok gotcha. i will edit these now. it put the 64 before i read your message. i thought i had a 64bit machine. actually i think i do lol but hey you know this better than i do and i replaced graphicsenabler with yes. lets try again.. brb.... UPDATE: ok. it says "can't find arch i386" should i change it to the 64 one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 oh ok gotcha. i will edit these now. it put the 64 before i read your message. i thought i had a 64bit machine. actually i think i do lol but hey you know this better than i do and i replaced graphicsenabler with yes. lets try again.. brb.... you can do either 32 or 64, your system support both, but for now let first test 32, then move to 64 (just for you to know, OSX is Hybrid system, it's doesn't really important to run 64 bit kernel as you can run 64 bit just fine under 32 bit kernel. i myself, can't boot to 64 bit cause of my sound card which support only 32 bit kernel, but still i have everything running, 64 bit works just fine and benchmark doesn't change on 32 or 64 bit for me (maybe minor but not something worth it) ok, don;t know why... but try with 64 bit and see what happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 you can do either 32 or 64, your system support both, but for now let first test 32, then move to 64(just for you to know, OSX is Hybrid system, it's doesn't really important to run 64 bit kernel as you can run 64 bit just fine under 32 bit kernel. i myself, can't boot to 64 bit cause of my sound card which support only 32 bit kernel, but still i have everything running, 64 bit works just fine and benchmark doesn't change on 32 or 64 bit for me (maybe minor but not something worth it) ok yea its says "can't find arch=i386" we are getting somewhere.. i can feel it lol EDIT: we are overlapping our responses!! lol ok will try 64 now.... UPDATE: now it says "cant find arch=x86_64" should i try reinstalling it all with [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]? maybe placing the dml on desktop, repairing the caches and all that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noam AA Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 ok yea its says "can't find arch=i386" we are getting somewhere.. i can feel it lol EDIT: we are overlapping our responses!! lol ok will try 64 now.... UPDATE: now it says "cant find arch=x86_64" should i try reinstalling it all with [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]? maybe placing the dml on desktop, repairing the caches and all that? very weird! i say try [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url], then wee see what next Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QbAnYtO Posted August 18, 2011 Author Share Posted August 18, 2011 very weird!i say try [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url], then wee see what next k going for that now...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.