Jump to content

Nvidia Fermi GTX 4xx, GTX2xx (+ others) Users for Benchmark WANTED


mitch_de
 Share

62 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Hi People!

 

Here are the Tests after Apple graphics Update 1.0 and new CUDA Driver installation on

this Test System:

 

Snow 10.6.4 64Bit

System identifier: iMac11,1

i7 860 2,8GHz

P55A UD3 Bios F9

8GB DDR3 1333 RAM

INNO3D GTX 285

Dual Monitor 2x24"

All test done with 1920 x 1080

 

GALAXIES 32K_V2

NVIDIA INNO3D GeForce GTX 285 1GB

 

_________SIM:___________________ GIGAFLOPS:

Vector Single Core CPU:___________________12

Vector Multi Core CPU:____________________46

GeForce GTX 285:______________________ 332

Hybrid Multi Core CPU+GPU:_______________80

 

 

post-292451-1283114588_thumb.png post-292451-1283114612_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114661_thumb.png post-292451-1283114716_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114750_thumb.png post-292451-1283114783_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114820_thumb.png post-292451-1283114884_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114910_thumb.png

 

Basic

post-292451-1283114952_thumb.png

Transparency

post-292451-1283114979_thumb.png

Benchmark

post-292451-1283114993_thumb.png

All Activated

post-292451-1283115009_thumb.png

 

Compare to earlier Test before Update not significant increase in Performance, only few Percent...

 

BR

QuattroFX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Hi People!

 

Here are the Tests after Apple graphics Update 1.0 and new CUDA Driver installation on

this Test System:

 

Snow 10.6.4 64Bit

System identifier: iMac11,1

i7 860 2,8GHz

P55A UD3 Bios F9

8GB DDR3 1333 RAM

INNO3D GTX 285

Dual Monitor 2x24"

All test done with 1920 x 1080

 

GALAXIES 32K_V2

NVIDIA INNO3D GeForce GTX 285 1GB

 

_________SIM:___________________ GIGAFLOPS:

Vector Single Core CPU:___________________12

Vector Multi Core CPU:____________________46

GeForce GTX 285:______________________ 332

Hybrid Multi Core CPU+GPU:_______________80

 

 

post-292451-1283114588_thumb.png post-292451-1283114612_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114661_thumb.png post-292451-1283114716_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114750_thumb.png post-292451-1283114783_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114820_thumb.png post-292451-1283114884_thumb.png

 

post-292451-1283114910_thumb.png

 

Basic

post-292451-1283114952_thumb.png

Transparency

post-292451-1283114979_thumb.png

Benchmark

post-292451-1283114993_thumb.png

All Activated

post-292451-1283115009_thumb.png

 

Compare to earlier Test before Update not significant increase in Performance, only few Percent...

 

BR

QuattroFX

 

Exactly the same as me my friend.

 

No Open Gl 3. And 28Fps in Cinebench.

 

I did no kext install or dsdt.. etc.. just Graphicsenable=yes

 

I've heard about Opengl 3.0 running in 10.6.4.

 

Do you think its a good move go to 10.6.4 from 10.6.3?

 

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly the same as me my friend.

 

No Open Gl 3. And 28Fps in Cinebench.

 

I did no kext install or dsdt.. etc.. just Graphicsenable=yes

 

I've heard about Opengl 3.0 running in 10.6.4.

 

Do you think its a good move go to 10.6.4 from 10.6.3?

 

cheers

 

Hi hugenschnauzer,

 

It is known that the current version of Mac OS X Snow Leopard supports 22 of the 23 OpenGL 3.0 extensions:

 

post-292451-1284451363_thumb.png

 

Apple seems to be gearing up for introducing full support for OpenGL 3.0. Increased graphics performance would result from the move, across Apple’s entire line of computers. Although the graphics cards used in current Macintosh computers already support OpenGL 3.0, the required software in order to take advantage of the specification is yet to be implemented in Snow Leopard, presume with 10.6.5 Update. Until then we have to live with full OpenGL 2.1 support only.

 

I´ve allready updated to 10.6.4 without loosing on performance on my system, but I cannot tell if that will be good

for you, because some people with x58 chipset reporting decrease on performance after update. Best way is to

try with one Clone drive of your system.

 

Good luck

QuattroFX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yep, OpenGLExtensions Viewer Bench cant run OpenGL 3.0 Test if at least one (of 23) 3.0 extensions and7or gpu hardware feature for 3.0 is missed. Didnt mean that Apple dont support 3.0 at all.

Some of newer features (3.0) if used!!! in Games may speedup them by much less CPU load for doing same things with 2.0 / 1.0 OpenGL tasks.

OpenGL is so much more CPU depended in Speed than DirectX.

barefeats new benches of running ATI 5770 or 5870 in MacPro 2006 vs MacPro 2010 shows that much.

Same GPU performs much much bad in MacPro 2006 - with games which arent cpu burner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thanks !

Would be fine if the new NV driver also makes GTX4xx woring with OpenCL !

 

I add the also very usable GRASS OpenCL (Code from Apple) Test .

Does compute grass in the wind movings - in OpenCL. Less CPU usage (less than smallluxGPU).

 

I get around 54 FPS with my 9600GT oldi ;

Grass_OPENCL.zip

Bildschirmfoto_2010_11_17_um_11.38.53.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for new benchmarks !

Try also the new King / Kings Modell. King is much more complex for the gpu - more game realistic FPS (less than Cube/Cubes).

 

As expected GTX 285 computes much faster GRASS OpenCL as 9600 GT : 95 FPS vs 51 FPS.

Any ATI (at least 4xxx, 5xxx should working OpenCL) - normaly they perform better OpenCL that NV because more compute units on the GPU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...