Jump to content

GA-EX58 and GA-X58A DSDT native power management modifications


  • Please log in to reply
1638 replies to this topic

#1621
MaLd0n

MaLd0n

    ...filling veins with juice of chaos...

  • Moderators
  • 15,034 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rio de Janeiro

its work

1366 use aicpupm and not X86PlatformPlugin / X86PlatformShim

 

u need a low pin count load

kextstat | grep LPC

and appleintelcpupm loaded

kextstat | grep AppleIntel

run it and post here

Attached File  kextstat.command.zip   717bytes   3 downloads



#1622
Rockey12

Rockey12

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 619 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth
  • Interests:no comi

kextstat.command 

 

(:

(:

   34    1 0xffffff7f8166e000 0x4000     0x4000     com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily (1.1) 185F0EBF-0262-3370-BD47-8FE4C8AA726E <5 4 3>

   98    1 0xffffff7f81f87000 0xe000     0xe000     com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusController (1.0.15d1) E1A1152A-1A83-3EE8-8E58-3483462779BC <34 12 11 5 4 3>

(:

   97    1 0xffffff7f82159000 0x1a000    0x1a000    com.apple.driver.AppleHDAController (2.6.0f1) 75C89447-A390-3C8C-9189-3074B972B3FD <96 81 12 7 6 5 4 3 1>

  116    0 0xffffff7f8225c000 0x90000    0x90000    com.apple.driver.AppleHDA (2.6.0f1) 6E9414B6-A952-3A0B-9467-DEFB73D82EAE <115 113 100 97 96 81 6 5 4 3 1>

(:

   13    1 0xffffff7f823e3000 0x60000    0x60000    com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform (5.0) FB729ABB-093F-386D-8A99-0CC2D2F39B6E <12 11 7 6 5 4 3 1>

   39    0 0xffffff7f82453000 0x4000     0x4000     com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons (5.0) A0FF1F0B-F2A9-3DC9-8983-2F1382815828 <38 15 13 11 7 6 5 4 3 1>

(:

Index Refs Address            Size       Wired      Name (Version) UUID <Linked Against>

   25    0 0xffffff7f8306b000 0x19000    0x19000    org.netkas.driver.FakeSMC (1421) 8252BBE6-2A73-35AC-919C-10AF2BE3909B <11 7 5 4 3 1>

   89    0 0xffffff7f80c11000 0x4000     0x4000     com.intel.driver.EnergyDriver (2.0) 4E0262A2-B79C-3386-8824-C106A5DFAF94 <7 5 4 3>

  117    0 0xffffff7f81c5f000 0x6000     0x6000     org.tw.CodecCommander (2.4.0) 7134FF3E-A6B0-36CE-9817-D33B255AD9E7 <113 12 4 3 1>

(:

   92    0 0xffffff7f81fd2000 0x3000     0x3000     com.apple.driver.AppleLPC (3.1) F51595F0-F9B1-3B85-A1C3-F984DAD4107E <91 12 5 4 3>

(:

   24    0 0xffffff7f820ab000 0x2b000    0x2b000    com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement (219.0.0) DA42A380-2795-392D-96A7-356FAB75E0A4 <7 6 5 4 3 1>

   31    0 0xffffff7f820a6000 0x3000     0x3000     com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient (219.0.0) B802638B-251C-3602-BA8C-001F87228765 <7 6 5 4 3 1>

   88    0 0xffffff7f82053000 0x2000     0x2000     com.apple.driver.AppleIntelSlowAdaptiveClocking (4.0.0) 6FE984DD-A1FE-309E-83CF-B346989A6F17 <87 4 3>

(:

(:

   32    0 0xffffff7f823b1000 0x3000     0x3000     com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC (1.7) BC2E6D01-BCBB-3525-BF38-BF99C3F1EC46 <4 3>

(:

(:

(:

  123    0 0xffffff7f820e7000 0xa000     0xa000     com.apple.driver.AppleHV (1) B18CFD59-98DB-32E6-8FBE-947F898E81D6 <7 6 5 4 3 1>

 

 

 kextstat | grep LPC

 

   92    0 0xffffff7f81fd2000 0x3000     0x3000     com.apple.driver.AppleLPC (3.1) F51595F0-F9B1-3B85-A1C3-F984DAD4107E <91 12 5 4 3>

 

 

 

 

kextstat | grep AppleIntel

 

   24    0 0xffffff7f820ab000 0x2b000    0x2b000    com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement (219.0.0) DA42A380-2795-392D-96A7-356FAB75E0A4 <7 6 5 4 3 1>

   31    0 0xffffff7f820a6000 0x3000     0x3000     com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient (219.0.0) B802638B-251C-3602-BA8C-001F87228765 <7 6 5 4 3 1>

   88    0 0xffffff7f82053000 0x2000     0x2000     com.apple.driver.AppleIntelSlowAdaptiveClocking (4.0.0) 6FE984DD-A1FE-309E-83CF-B346989A6F17 <87 4 3>

 



#1623
MaLd0n

MaLd0n

    ...filling veins with juice of chaos...

  • Moderators
  • 15,034 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rio de Janeiro

 

24    0 0xffffff7f820ab000 0x2b000    0x2b000    com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement (219.0.0) DA42A380-2795-392D-96A7-356FAB75E0A4 <7 6 5 4 3 1>

   31    0 0xffffff7f820a6000 0x3000     0x3000     com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient (219.0.0) B802638B-251C-3602-BA8C-001F87228765 <7 6 5 4 3 1>

 

 

 92    0 0xffffff7f81fd2000 0x3000     0x3000     com.apple.driver.AppleLPC (3.1) F51595F0-F9B1-3B85-A1C3-F984DAD4107E <91 12 5 4 3>

its nice

but, how to check frequency in lga 1366?

 

try a AppleIntelInfo by Pike

 

put in desktop

Attached File  AppleIntelInfo.kext.zip   32.75KB   6 downloads

and run

sudo chown -R 0:0 ~/Desktop/AppleIntelInfo.kext
sudo chmod -R 755 ~/Desktop/AppleIntelInfo.kext
sudo kextload ~/Desktop/AppleIntelInfo.kext

and for full log

sudo cat /tmp/AppleIntelInfo.dat


#1624
Rockey12

Rockey12

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 619 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth
  • Interests:no comi

sorry maldon but got kernel panic when i install AppleIntelInfo.kext



#1625
MaLd0n

MaLd0n

    ...filling veins with juice of chaos...

  • Moderators
  • 15,034 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rio de Janeiro

no Intel Power Gadget

no AppleIntelInfo.kext

but works, i see in ioreg

;)



#1626
pkdesign

pkdesign

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Gender:Male

Hello,

 

I have XEON W3680 overclocked in Bios to W3690 :D

 

You can find my config.plist; DSDT.aml and kexts I use here:

 

http://www.insanelym...32#entry2286204

 

Dont put , in your frequency's on CPU !  (Clover config.plist)

mine looks lke this

 

attachicon.gifCapture d'écran 2016-10-02 16.11.42.png

I assume the "arobasefr" on Geekbench browser specs is you :-)

How did you get your score up that high? What are your overclocking settings?

I was thinking about getting the W3680 and replacing the i7 975 I got last year. Not sure if two extra cores are worth it.

Thanks!



#1627
mcbeth303

mcbeth303

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts
  • Gender:Male

The w3680 is still a very powerfull CPU. But I dont think that you will get a lot of speed improvements in most real life scenarios compared to the i7 975, only if you use programs that make use of all the cores a lot.

other than that it is getting pretty old. SATA2, PCIe2.0 etc.

Last time i checked the prices for CPUs boards etc seemed to be pretty high too.

its a pretty power hungry CPU aswell with the 130W TDP, the i5-6500 hack i have has pretty much the same results in Multicore geekbench runs, while it adds 1700points to single core performance

 

but If you can get a cheap w3680 it does not hurt really either

 

w3680 vs i5-6500



#1628
pkdesign

pkdesign

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Gender:Male

The w3680 is still a very powerfull CPU. But I dont think that you will get a lot of speed improvements in most real life scenarios compared to the i7 975, only if you use programs that make use of all the cores a lot.

other than that it is getting pretty old. SATA2, PCIe2.0 etc.

Last time i checked the prices for CPUs boards etc seemed to be pretty high too.

its a pretty power hungry CPU aswell with the 130W TDP, the i5-6500 hack i have has pretty much the same results in Multicore geekbench runs, while it adds 1700points to single core performance

 

but If you can get a cheap w3680 it does not hurt really either

 

w3680 vs i5-6500

 

Yea, this is exactly what I thought. I'm pretty happy with the i7-975. I've got it overclocked to 4.0GHz (can't seem to get it to 4.12, my hack just reboots but Windows has no problem with it.)

 

At this point I think I'm chasing rainbows since I get great performance out of my nearly 10 year old hack! Always looking to tinker I guess!

 

Pretty amazing that this old board and CPU can keep up with most modern macs. I've added USB 3 and updated the NIC to one recognized by the OS. Honestly, not sure what else I need! :yes:



#1629
@ROBASEFR

@ROBASEFR

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 532 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France

I assume the "arobasefr" on Geekbench browser specs is you :-)

How did you get your score up that high? What are your overclocking settings?

I was thinking about getting the W3680 and replacing the i7 975 I got last year. Not sure if two extra cores are worth it.

Thanks!

 

Well yes it's me ! :)

 

With the latest Geekbench 4.1 it is even better  2971 and multicore 14330

 

I have made just a little overclock from original 3.33 Ghz to 3.46 Ghz

 

In bios settings only changed multiplication factor =26 

(original 133,33Mhz)

 

In Clover Cpu settings (same):

Attached File  Capture d'écran 2017-04-01 17.58.45.png   192.85KB   0 downloads

 

Yes I agree, this mobo with SSD, SATA3 and USB3 cards and a nice GC, works splendid for almost 7 years now as a MAC :D

 

Lowest price I see on Ebay for XEON W3680 = 110$

 

Best Geekbench score I saw for your Core i7 975 : 2799 and 9194

https://browser.prim.../v4/cpu/2134196

 

Have a Good day



#1630
pkdesign

pkdesign

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Gender:Male

Well yes it's me ! :)

 

With the latest Geekbench 4.1 it is even better  2971 and multicore 14330

 

I have made just a little overclock from original 3.33 Ghz to 3.46 Ghz

 

In bios settings only changed multiplication factor =26 

(original 133,33Mhz)

 

In Clover Cpu settings (same):

attachicon.gifCapture d'écran 2017-04-01 17.58.45.png

 

Yes I agree, this mobo with SSD, SATA3 and USB3 cards and a nice GC, works splendid for almost 7 years now as a MAC :D

 

Lowest price I see on Ebay for XEON W3680 = 110$

 

Best Geekbench score I saw for your Core i7 975 : 2799 and 9194

https://browser.prim.../v4/cpu/2134196

 

Have a Good day

 

Well that must really be the six cores! I have my i7-975 OC'd to 4Ghz and get 3346 single and 10972 multi score with Geekbench 4.0.4. I guess i should just be satisfied and move on! :lol:



#1631
Foxic

Foxic

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,068 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:U.K.
I've also recently updated to a hex core.
This is my latest geekbench --> https://browser.prim.../v4/cpu/2495437

I had to get a higher flow pump and larger rad to keep up with it all but temps on full load now top out at around 70C. Thats after a few hours of prime95 torture.

Picked up a USB3 card with native support and a Sonnet SATA3 PCI-E card, just waiting for the SSD to arrive.

It's hard not to be impressed by this motherboard. I originally put this together to run 10.6 and here we are on 10.12.4.

Edit: motherboard won't post with the Sonnet Tempo installed, even with no SSD attached. Error 8b.

#1632
Foxic

Foxic

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,068 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:U.K.

I've been speaking with both Sonnet and Gigabyte about this incompatibility and it seems it's down to a lack of bios space on high end boards.

Gigabyte's suggestion is to disable audio and LAN....no.

 

Anyway, I got a bit bored after just plugging the SSD into a sata port so I got HDMI audio working on my 480 GTX.

DSDT attached in case it's useful to anyone.

 

 

Attached Files



#1633
pkdesign

pkdesign

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Gender:Male

Would love to see photos of you case inside and out.



#1634
@ROBASEFR

@ROBASEFR

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 532 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France

I've been speaking with both Sonnet and Gigabyte about this incompatibility and it seems it's down to a lack of bios space on high end boards.

Gigabyte's suggestion is to disable audio and LAN....no.

 

Anyway, I got a bit bored after just plugging the SSD into a sata port so I got HDMI audio working on my 480 GTX.

DSDT attached in case it's useful to anyone.

 

Hi Foxic,

 

Did you try with this AHCIPortInjector.kext ?  (EFI/Kexts/10.12)

 

I never had a problem with my SATA3 and SSD on this MOBO ( ASUS -U3S6) Marvell 88SE9120

 

Good luck

 

@robasefr

Attached Files



#1635
Foxic

Foxic

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,068 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:U.K.

Did you try with this AHCIPortInjector.kext ? (EFI/Kexts/10.12)
@robasefr

Thanks but the problem isn't OS related. I can't get the system to post with it installed. I can't even get as far as the BIOS.

Would love to see photos of you case inside and out.

I'll do you one better, here's my original build thread from 5 years ago --> http://www.insanelym...rcooled-g5-mod/

Since then it's had a x5670, a better pump, new fans, a deeper rad, SSD, USB 3 card, wifi card and I've replaced the PSU.

#1636
@ROBASEFR

@ROBASEFR

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 532 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France

Thanks but the problem isn't OS related. I can't get the system to post with it installed. I can't even get as far as the BIOS.
 

You could try this latest modded bios F13 mod 11 that i use since years

(from:http://www.jzelectro.../jz2/index.php)

 

Specs:

Intel® RAID ROM 13.2.0.2134 (Raid0 Trim)
2. Realtek LAN ROM 2.59
3. JMicron ROM 1.07.28
4. Marvell Bios Version 1.0.0.1033 (depends chip version)
4. Marvell Bios Version 1.0.0.1029 (depends chip version)
5. Firmware 2.2.0.1125 (depends chip version)

 

(I use the QFlash method from a USBkey)

 

Good luck !

 

Attached File  EX58-UD5-F13_mod11.zip   1.37MB   2 downloads



#1637
Emilo

Emilo

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 121 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

I use OSX native, bootable SYBA SY-PEX40039 SATA III PCI-E card. It gives me 417MB/s Write and 436MB/s read speeds with Samsung 840 Pro.

 

http://www.insanelym...r-motherboards/

http://www.insanelym...-ud5/?p=2345859



#1638
pkdesign

pkdesign

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Gender:Male

I'll do you one better, here's my original build thread from 5 years ago --> http://www.insanelym...rcooled-g5-mod/

Since then it's had a x5670, a better pump, new fans, a deeper rad, SSD, USB 3 card, wifi card and I've replaced the PSU.

Cool, that is awesome!



#1639
mcbeth303

mcbeth303

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts
  • Gender:Male

I had a run with geekbench 4.1 and it adds quite some points to the results compared to earlier versions. Makes it hard to compare. But the results seem to be more accurate now, had a few runs and they all spat out basically the same Result with only a few points difference.

 

Geekbench V4.0.3 vs V4.1.0 same OS version, same overclocking settings

 

https://browser.prim...aseline=2849906







0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2016 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   PHP hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy