18 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:03 PM
Just over write the folder in root/Extra
with any one of these:
[removed]
I modified these for the better of the community
The stock Chameleon_2.0-RC-GUI installs:
667mhz Ram ETC. or un-ideal results.
with any one of these:
[removed]
I modified these for the better of the community
The stock Chameleon_2.0-RC-GUI installs:
667mhz Ram ETC. or un-ideal results.
#2
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:15 PM
don't use this.
#3
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:19 PM
#4
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:22 PM
#5
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:30 PM
#6
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:33 PM
#7
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:44 PM
you being stupid.
stop.
stop.
#8
Posted 07 April 2009 - 04:28 PM
kabyl = stupid? You are really new here at insanelymac. Please be more respectful; without him probably there wouldn't be any ideneb, chamaleon or anything else that makes your hackintosh work.
#9
Posted 07 April 2009 - 04:54 PM
#10
Posted 07 April 2009 - 04:57 PM
#11
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:47 PM
To learn whats NOT DOING , what did the user recommended ?
Its now removed from that post, maybe new post with do not "...."
Its now removed from that post, maybe new post with do not "...."
#12
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:55 PM
#13
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:54 PM
how very violent things are turning will be deleted or closed soon, respect those who know what t5here talking about otherwise will cause problems
#14
Posted 08 April 2009 - 09:37 AM
ale§, on Apr 7 2009, 09:28 AM, said:
kabyl = stupid? You are really new here at insanelymac. Please be more respectful
He didn't call Kabyl stupid, he said he was being stupid
He posted some configuration that apparently wasn't a good one, and when asked what was wrong with it, Kabyl replied with a cryptic "You'll see..."
I wouldn't exactly call that "respectful"
#15
Posted 08 April 2009 - 10:51 AM
So i dont understand.. who is stupid in the end?
#16
Posted 08 April 2009 - 11:17 AM
EGOvoruhk, on Apr 8 2009, 10:37 AM, said:
He didn't call Kabyl stupid, he said he was being stupid
He posted some configuration that apparently wasn't a good one, and when asked what was wrong with it, Kabyl replied with a cryptic "You'll see..."
I wouldn't exactly call that "respectful"
He posted some configuration that apparently wasn't a good one, and when asked what was wrong with it, Kabyl replied with a cryptic "You'll see..."
I wouldn't exactly call that "respectful"
EGOvoruhk, on Apr 8 2009, 10:37 AM, said:
He didn't call Kabyl stupid, he said he was being stupid
He posted some configuration that apparently wasn't a good one, [and asked people to "Just over write the folder in root/Extra", and then Kabyl said don't use it, then the guy replied with "use it, it works" not with a 'why?', so Kabyl replied with a small correction which apparently he didn't understand (because Kabyl is cryptic..),] and when asked what was wrong with it, Kabyl replied with a cryptic "You'll see..."
I wouldn't exactly call that "respectful"
He posted some configuration that apparently wasn't a good one, [and asked people to "Just over write the folder in root/Extra", and then Kabyl said don't use it, then the guy replied with "use it, it works" not with a 'why?', so Kabyl replied with a small correction which apparently he didn't understand (because Kabyl is cryptic..),] and when asked what was wrong with it, Kabyl replied with a cryptic "You'll see..."
I wouldn't exactly call that "respectful"
I would probably have explained if he didn't reply with "use it, it works" instead of asking the 'why?', but then, it was less likely because I hate such posts without explanations (I did it in the past and I know why it's not good), even if I don't need it, I'm willing to investigate it, not like most of the people here.
So my reply was as short as his, and saved people (who don't know what they are doing) from overwriting their files.
I'm sorry if that was any close to being rude (or stupid for that matter), but no one here has the right the demand anything from anyone, so don't tell me something in the lines of; you could have at least explained to him why.
It hard for people to keep themselves from giving their opinions most of the time, but they should try harder when it's not helpful, and even harder when it's destructive.
Shall we put this to end?
#17
Posted 08 April 2009 - 01:10 PM
Another "thread of the year" in the making? I can't say i really enjoyed the KextSpy thread but it was cringeworthy to a certain degree. Looks like InsanelyMac reached new lows lately, congrats.
#18
Posted 08 April 2009 - 03:53 PM
lol, someone remove this thread getting serious for some reason, remind me of the godfather this conversation show respect or be spammed to dead with angry people arguing on what you said, but this isn't the lowest post on here i saw another one asking for directx for mac
#19
Posted 08 April 2009 - 10:50 PM
Kabyl, on Apr 8 2009, 04:17 AM, said:
It's posted just above, in the same page as your reply, and you couldn't be fair to write the whole story.
Actually, his comment was edited well before my post, which is why I said "some configuration" rather than what he suggested. Even if he suggested the stupidest thing ever, he obviously doesn't know any better. Rather than telling him why, you were being cryptic, which is what set him off. That was my point
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account








