Jump to content

ATI 4850/4870 Users, Can you post please your Shaderspeed?


mitch_de
 Share

15 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

DL the App

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.p...lease_id=566984

 

Start it, you will se some moving boxes. A few seconds testtime are enough, you can close the app.

The Speed Values (FPS) are written in the console log.

 

Here some results (got in the german maclife forum thread)

 

CanATI 48XX beat:boxing: the Nr. 1 in list: 8800GTS , Winner with near 30 FPS ? :)

YEAH:

ATI HD4870 from 38 - 44 FPS, lot of times faster than Oldies like ATI2600 (4+-FPS )

 

all HD4850 around 29-31 FPS

 

Q9550@3,2 GHz, 4 GB RAM, Geforce 8800GTS : around 30 FPS

Mac Pro 2x2.0Ghz GeForce 8800GT FPS:20.874102

E8400 3GHz/4GB DDR2/500GB HDD/SD/BT/ATI HD3870 FPS:19.161676

mitch C2D 2.66 - ATI 3850 512 MB- 16 FPS

MacBook Pro 2.53 GHz GeForce 9400M FPS:3.9275951

GeForce 9600M GT FPS:9.142857

MacBookPro4,1 | GeForce 8600M GT ( 512 MB ) = 7,5 FPS

Macbook Alu (late 2008) Geforce 9400M = 4+ FPS

Alu iMac 2,4 GHz, 24", 2 GB Ram, ATI Radeon 2600 = 4- FPS

MacBook Air (1. Gen) GMA X3100 = 0.2 FPS

 

-------------------------- Gameoflife on GPU ------

Give also that GPU GAMEofLife ob GPU Bench an try.

Its puts Shaderprogrammcode on the GPU (like raytraycing) and compute the game of life.

App is an screensafer.

 

DL the small saver, run it (double click) and settings:

Fullscreen, show FPS and Zoom=1 (to get compareable FPS values!!!. Zoom=2 gives much more FPS, not comparable with Zoom=1)

 

Results:

Sapphire 1GB Radeon HD 4870 @ 1920x1200, 856.08 FPS :superman:

C2D, Asus EAH4850 TOP/HTDI/512M (ATi HD4850) at 1440X900 result 1068.33 FPS

Hint: Always look also at the resolution, if you compare your card FPS!

Example gameoflife FPS above:

ATI 4870 = 1920x1200=2.304.000 Pixel to compute = 856 FPS

ATI 4850 = 1440x900 = 1.296.000 Pixel to compute = 1068 FPS.

First look maybe give: 4850 is faster - but thats very wrong !!

Always compare Pixel (X*Y) resolution also - so 4870 has done * 1,77 work as 4850,

because much higher res.

856 * 1,77 = 1521 FPS , this FPS around (I GUESS) would be that 4870 at lower res 1440*900 !

ATI4870 512mb 1680x1050 = 983.23 FPS

ATI HD4850 Gainward Golden sample 1920x1080-32bits 672 FPS

 

Geforce 8800 GTS, 1920*1200(16:10)= 552 FPS

1600x1200(4:3)= 660 FPS

Mac Pro 8x 2,8Ghz Geforce 8800 GT 1600x1200(4:3)= 566 FPS

ATI 3850 1600x1200 (4:3) = 410 FPS

1400x1050 = 520 FPS 1280x960 = 610 FPS

iMac 24" 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

1600x1200(4:3): 364 fps 1920x1200 (16:10): 305 fps

Imac, ATI Radeon HD 2600, Core 2 Duo 2,4 GHz. ?

1680x1050(16:10) = 151 FPS 1280x800 = 264 FPS

Macbookli 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (late 2008) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

1280x800: 135 fps 1024x786: 176 fps

MacMini, ??, GMA 950

1600x1200 = 3,5 FPS :D

 

Thanks !

gpulife_ub.saver.zip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks , added all known FPS in the first posting!

 

Give also that GPU GAMEofLife ob GPU Bench an try.

Its puts Shaderprogrammcode on the GPU (like raytraycing) and compute the game of life.

App is an screensafer.

 

DL the small saver, run it (double click) and settings: Fullscreen, show FPS and Zoom=1 (to get compareable FPS values)

 

 

Results:

nonym: GA-EP45-DS4, Intel QuadCore Q9550 @ 3,2 GHz, 4 GB RAM , Geforce 8800 GTS, efix-Modul.

1920*1200(16:10)= 552 FPS (4:3=470 FPS)

1600x1200(4:3)= 660 FPS

 

gast Mac Pro 8x 2,8Ghz Geforce 8800 GT

1600x1200(4:3)= 566 FPS

 

mitchs GA-EP35_DS3, Intel C2D 2.5 GHz, ATI 3850[, 4:3 Bildschirm

Für 16:10 Bildschirmformat FPS : 16:10 FPS * 0.85 = 4:3 FPS) um aus zB. 1680x1050, 1600x1200 "FPS" zu machen.

1600x1200 (4:3) = 410 FPS

1400x1050 = 520 FPS

1280x960 = 610 FPS

 

antilons iMac 24" 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

1600x1200(4:3): 364 fps

1920x1200 (16:10): 305 fps (4:3=262 FPS)

 

macfans Imac, ATI Radeon HD 2600, Core 2 Duo 2,4 GHz. ?

1680x1050(16:10) = 151 FPS (würde bei bei 4:3 =1600x1200= 129 FPS )

1280x800 = 264 FPS (4:3) = 225 FPS)

PS: iMac mit NV 8800GS GPU spürbar flinker!

 

antiklons Macbookli 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (late 2008) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

1280x800: 135 fps (4:3 = 114,75 FPS)

1024x786: 176 fps

 

uemit, MacMini, ??, GMA 950

1600x1200 = 3,5 FPS

gpulife_ub.saver.zip

bild_225.jpg

life.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.

Can someone with ATI 48xx also try the gpu gameoflife ?

Use it with settings seen in my post for comparable FPS and also add your screen resolution (the higher the res, the more points the gpu must compute gol , the less the fps).

Already found gameoflife GPU FPS you can compare with yours from my post above.

 

Both gpu shader tests are very gpu dependend, less cpu dependend.

An MacPro (4 Cores) with NV 7300 GT got only 1,3 FPS in the raytraycing gpu bench, the new ATI 4870 values up to 44 FPS - near same GPU!!!

ATI 4870 is over 25 times faster (in Programm-Shading!!) than 7300GT - but not also 25 times faster in normal OpenGL (Games).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4850

 

FPS:29.90654

FPS:29.357798

FPS:29.438822

FPS:29.064486

FPS:29.934519

FPS:28.520496

FPS:29.011786

FPS:29.493086

FPS:29.330887

FPS:28.69955

FPS:29.962545

FPS:29.30403

FPS:28.62254

FPS:29.30403

You show off netkas, you def won this round over the 8800gt :P

 

The 4870 512mb peeks 9% quicker than the 8800gt peek here which is wonderful and all but what about dual monitors? Anyone have a hunch that they will work in the relatively near future before I fleabay the 4870 ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...