Jump to content

fluid | fixed

Is 10.5.5 faster than 10.5.4?


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1
kdb424

kdb424

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 195 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Right Here, USA
I honestly have no idea how good these benchmarks are. Let me know!

System info

Operating system:    Mac OS X 10.5.4 (Build 9E17)
Model:    MacBook Pro (Mid 2007)
Processor:    Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
Frequency:    2.20 GHz
Total CPU number:    2
Physical CPU number:    1
Bus frequency:    800 MHz
Memory size:    2.00 GB
Memory type:    667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
Compiled with:    GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
Tests results

Composite result:    3.36
iBench_fp test suite

Householder transformation:    3.54
Gaussian blur:    3.33
Mandelbrot set generation:    3.29
Numerical integration:    3.29
JPEG compression:    3.32
LU decomposition:    3.43
Edge detection:    3.85
Fast Fourier Transform:    3.34
Eigenvalue:    3.35
Partial result:    3.41
iBench_int test suite

Prime numbers calculation:    3.37
Blowfish cypher:    3.35
Kruskal tree search:    3.39
ZIP compression:    3.55
Integer factorization:    3.23
N Queens problem:    3.44
Maximum Common Divisor:    3.36
Quick sorting:    3.23
Binary searching:    3.08
Bubble sorting:    3.12
MD5 hashing:    3.32
Partial result:    3.31


System info

Operating system:    Mac OS X 10.5.5 (Build 9F9)
Model:    MacBook Pro (Mid 2007)
Processor:    Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
Frequency:    2.20 GHz
Total CPU number:    2
Physical CPU number:    1
Bus frequency:    800 MHz
Memory size:    2.00 GB
Memory type:    667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
Compiled with:    GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
Tests results

Composite result:    3.10
iBench_fp test suite

Householder transformation:    3.07
Gaussian blur:    3.01
Mandelbrot set generation:    3.22
Numerical integration:    3.06
JPEG compression:    3.15
LU decomposition:    2.86
Edge detection:    3.66
Fast Fourier Transform:    3.05
Eigenvalue:    3.00
Partial result:    3.11
iBench_int test suite

Prime numbers calculation:    3.13
Blowfish cypher:    3.12
Kruskal tree search:    2.80
ZIP compression:    3.13
Integer factorization:    3.01
N Queens problem:    3.21
Maximum Common Divisor:    3.15
Quick sorting:    3.06
Binary searching:    3.03
Bubble sorting:    3.13
MD5 hashing:    3.13
Partial result:    3.08


You tell me!

#2
age_sabres18

age_sabres18

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 62 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
i got 176 w/o HD in 10.5.4 -----> up to 186 w/o HD in 10.5.5 9f32

#3
Funky frank

Funky frank

    InsanelyMac Sage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 283 posts
Maybe some background indexes were running after installing 10.5.5 like spotlight indexing?

Can you re-run again the 10.5.5 benchmark again please?

#4
nano2nd

nano2nd

    Monkey See, Monkey Do

  • Retired
  • 190 posts
  • Location:UK
Xbench is running round about the same for me but graphics performance is massively improved:

Posted Image

Previous score was around 25,000 :)

#5
copperboy

copperboy

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 105 posts
I don't think so. You can see there is little difference on Geekbench.

http://forum.insanel...howtopic=127274





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2013 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   Web hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy