Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Xbench (intel version) results of new iMac
InsanelyMac Forum > Discuss and Learn > Apple Opinions and Discussion
pion
man, these result are pretty crap lol. my Intel 650 beats it (score 76).

edit; ops enter wrong number. 650 3.4ghz
stryder
QUOTE (pion @ Jan 15 2006, 08:17 AM) *
man, these result are pretty crap lol. my Intel 640 beats it (score 76).


Yes, but for the price it's a nice machine. Your Intel 640 is a 3.2 GHz processor, with 800 MHz FSB, right? Just wait until Apple ships the Intel PowerMac's (I presume they will be called Mac Pro). That will be the power user's machine!
VaiOSX
what is the Xbench result for an ADP machine ?

Anybody here can post it ?

Also, it would be good if we can get Xbench results (with a 8f1111a version) from new PCs with a Core Duo CPU to compare.
cyrana
I don't think xbench does SMP so well, either, does it? And that machine doesn't have the fastest hard drive in it. Still seems slightly low though.
mykell9999
man that doesnt look good at all, my crappy p4 503 ( 2.66 ghz, single core, no HT ) machine has a score in the mid 60's, 66.xx more or less.

i thought they were supposed to be 3 -4x faster.............
bjr1028
xbench isn't a very useful benchmark. Its results tend is differ depending on the time of day.
berehon
Just look in UI tests of new imacs. It cant be correct. I cant believe that GMA900 two-three times faster then x1600.
It seems xbench doesn't love ati cards.
BTW on xbench.com there is a note about this.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.