QUOTE (Synaesthesia @ May 6 2008, 03:56 PM)

Wow, very interesting stuff...I'd wonder if that is legally valid, and if the courts will uphold that...
Exactly. That was
the most interesting thing in the article to me too. I thought Apple knew the existence of such case (otherwise Psystar is a history already), and that's why Apple doesn't try Psystar in court now. And if Apple ever loses in court,
that's the end of Mac hardware revenue (not completely true but I am sure Apple will be crippled for good). That's why I think Apple is keeping silent and developing technical obstacles for installing Mac OS X to hackintoshes
now.
P.S. I think this eBay seller is
one of us by the way.
P.P.S. The other "the most interesting thing" to me was the number of USB ports:
three. Really?
QUOTE (Alessandro17 @ May 6 2008, 04:45 PM)

Would you believe that this is what was going on in my mind as well? How many people who run OS X on a hackintosh in this forum pay for a Leopard licence? Next to nobody, I suppose.But If you buy a computer with OS X from Psystar, you'll have to pay for a Leopard licence.
P.P.P.S. I paid my copies of Mac OS X.