nothing interesting here |
  |
nothing interesting here |
|
Vitaliy
InsanelyMac Geek
|
 |
 Oct 17 2006, 11:10 PM Post #1
|
|
---
This post has been edited by Vitaliy: Nov 20 2006, 05:48 PM |
  |
 
|
|
bikedude880
InsanelyMac Legend
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:12 PM Post #2
|
 
|
The first question, and I'm sure it will be the most asked: Is that actually a Hackintosh or is that a real Apple computer?
|
|
|
|
|
Vitaliy
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:16 PM Post #3
|
|
-
This post has been edited by Vitaliy: Nov 20 2006, 05:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
enb14
InsanelyMac Legend
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:18 PM Post #4
|
|
what about a video on youtube
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vitaliy
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:20 PM Post #5
|
|
-
This post has been edited by Vitaliy: Nov 20 2006, 05:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
BugsB
InsanelyMac Legend
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:38 PM Post #6
|
|
You're pretty darn quick, aren't you ..
 You just had a couple of hours time to modify the 10.4.8 kernel source to boot into write protected -s mode. Wow I'm really stunned.
|
|
|
|
|
Kiko
You Dont Understand Me
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:40 PM Post #7
|
|
It is possible if you know what to patch as im sure the initialisation routines havent (or shouldnt have) really changed that much in the new sources
|
|
|
|
|
fokker
InsanelyMac Protégé
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:41 PM Post #8
|
|
In what type of machine does this kernel run? Core (2) duo or something? what are the requierements. It is usable?
|
|
|
|
|
bwhsh8r
InsanelyMac Deity
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:42 PM Post #9
|
 
|
... howd u do that?
|
|
|
|
|
Vitaliy
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:43 PM Post #10
|
|
-
This post has been edited by Vitaliy: Nov 20 2006, 05:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
Kiko
You Dont Understand Me
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:43 PM Post #11
|
|
Im sure at the moment it will be Intel, SSE3 (or 2) and a mob which has HPET ( if he hasnt bypassed it), but it could just be on a mac so we dunno yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Vitaliy
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:45 PM Post #12
|
|
-
This post has been edited by Vitaliy: Nov 20 2006, 05:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
skredii
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:50 PM Post #13
|
|
Where did you get those sources from?
|
|
|
|
|
Vitaliy
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:57 PM Post #14
|
|
-
This post has been edited by Vitaliy: Nov 20 2006, 05:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
Takuro
InsanelyMac Legend
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:01 AM Post #15
|
 
|
This is strange... does your processor have a dual-core, Vitality? It should be easier (technically) to run a 10.4.8 kernel on a Core Duo because of certain power management instructions that are specific to a Core Duo's architecture. That's why all kernels since the 10.4.4 release haven't been able to run on the majority of our CPUs.
If the 10.4.8 kernel was really patched, this is big news. |
|
|
|
|
Vitaliy
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:05 AM Post #16
|
|
-
This post has been edited by Vitaliy: Nov 20 2006, 05:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
Kiko
You Dont Understand Me
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:08 AM Post #17
|
|
yah many people think HPET is CPU dependent, but it is actually a feautre of the motherboard
|
|
|
|
|
Proteo
InsanelyMac Legend
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:09 AM Post #18
|
|
Yeah, Pentium D's are dual core. They are not Core Duo though. Their setup is quite similar to mine!
Kudos Vitaliy, that’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind 
|
|
|
|
|
blkblt
InsanelyMac Geek
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:10 AM Post #19
|
|
Very, very nice work! Hopefully the new Rosetta will (or can be made to) work with this new kernel, then we'll be in really good shape...
/blkblt |
|
|
|
|
guiyoforward
InsanelyMac Sage
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:19 AM Post #20
|
|
how does this relate to semthex's efforts?
http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?sho...c=30316&hl= |
|
|
|
| |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 12:29 AM |
